What Happens When Teachers Get an AI Partner Instead of Another Tool?
Lessons from Finland, Greece, Colombia, and Brazil
Over the past 2 years, Elina has been used in very different classrooms around the world: Nordic municipal preschools, Mediterranean pilot schools, Latin American classrooms, and a busy inclusive classroom in Brazil.
Teachers didn’t describe it as automation. They described it as cognitive relief. Below is what they actually said and what it reveals about Elina’s core value: not replacing teaching, but supporting the thinking behind it.
Finland: From Documentation Burden to Pedagogical Thinking
In Finnish early childhood centers, educators spend significant time writing observations, individual plans, and communicating with families. The problem is rarely knowing what to do, it is having the time to structure it properly.
Teachers began using Elina primarily for three tasks:
-
Structuring pedagogical plans
-
Writing child development descriptions
-
Communicating learning goals to parents
One educator summarized the shift:
“When AI speeds up planning, educators have more time to be with children.”
This is Elina’s first core value proposition: time redistribution. Not faster teaching, but more present teaching. A second pattern appeared: teachers used Elina to articulate pedagogical reasoning they already intuitively understood but rarely had time to express. The assistant helped clarify why an activity mattered developmentally.
Educators described it as a work partner rather than software, something that supports planning and strengthens pedagogical quality. Elina externalizes pedagogical reasoning.
Greece: Learning to Think With the System
In Greece, teachers initially interacted with Elina like a search engine. Early feedback showed excitement but also uncertainty about how to use it effectively. Over time, usage changed from asking questions to refining ideas. Teachers moved into iterative collaboration:
“At first, I found it a bit challenging to understand how to fully use Elina, but once I got the hang of it, I saw how much time it saved me.”
“Elina is a wonderful tool! It has helped me plan engaging activities quickly, and I appreciate the fresh ideas it provides.”
This revealed a second core value proposition: collaborative ideation. Teachers were not consuming outputs, they were shaping them. Planning became dialogue:
-
simplify
-
adapt
-
extend
-
connect objectives
Repeated use made planning easier, not because the system changed, but because teachers learned a new workflow: co‑thinking instead of searching. Elina turns planning into a conversation instead of a lookup task.
Colombia: Turning Activities Into Learning Sequences
In Colombia, teachers used Elina daily for one month across multiple preschool groups. Here, the benefits became concrete and classroom‑visible. Teachers consistently described three outcomes: engagement, coherence, and confidence.
“It always suggests very appropriate and engaging activities for the children.”
“It has greatly facilitated my work.”
“Elina is a very helpful tool in education.”
Previously, teachers assembled activities from multiple sources. With Elina, they built connected learning sequences instead of isolated exercises. Activities reinforced the same skill through consistent themes, improving participation and comprehension.
This reveals a third core value proposition: pedagogical continuity. Elina doesn’t just generate activities, it helps structure progression over time. Elina connects ideas into developmental learning journeys.
Brazil: Differentiation Without Burnout
In Brazil, a teacher working with students including autism and ADHD used Elina heavily for adaptation and weekly planning. Her main challenge wasn’t generating activities, it was adapting each one for multiple learners.
She described creating her first learner profile as:
“totally easy”
When the system generated a developmental description aligned with her classroom observations, she reacted:
“incredible”
Later she evaluated the learner profiles as:
“perfect”
The most important shift was not speed but structure. Instead of preparing different materials every weekend, she could maintain one learning goal across multiple variations. She also confirmed the creative impact: The system suggested creating fairy‑tale environments in the school forest, an idea she had never considered despite having the space available.
Her weekends changed because planning moved into the week. This reveals a fourth core value proposition: scalable differentiation. Elina allows teachers to maintain pedagogical consistency while adapting for individual learners, especially crucial in inclusive classrooms.
Elina personalizes learning paths without multiplying teacher workload.
The Pattern Across Countries
Across four countries and different educational systems, teachers independently described the same transformation:
-
Less mental effort to start planning
-
Clearer developmental goals
-
More coherent activities
-
Greater student engagement
-
More time interacting with learners
No teacher described Elina as replacing their role. They described it as reducing friction in professional thinking.
What Elina Actually Is
Most educational technology tries to improve learning by interacting directly with students. Elina works earlier, at the moment teaching decisions are formed, and supports the educator’s reasoning process. And when teacher thinking becomes easier to organize, classrooms become easier to run. The consistent global outcome wasn’t technological. It was human: teachers gained back cognitive space and gave that space to children.